Trump: his Supreme Court nomination and What you should know
Trump: his Supreme Court nomination and What you should know

TRUMP Supreme Court : US president says he has narrowed his list to four, with a final decision expected late on Monday.


US President Donald Trump is set to announce his choice for the replacement of Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy on Monday night.

The president told reporters on Sunday that he still had not locked down his decision, but had narrowed the field to four candidates.

“I’m very close to making a final decision. And I believe this person will do a great job,” Trump said.

Trump is expected to make the announcement at 9pm local time (01:00GMT) on Monday.

He tweeted late on Sunday that he was looking forward to announcing his pick, adding that: “An exceptional person will be chosen.”

It’s the second pick Trump has made since taking over the presidency last year.

Here’s what we know so far:

Who is being considered?

Trump has kept quiet on his shortlist of candidates, but top contenders for the role have included federal appeals judges Brett Kavanaugh, Raymond Kethledge, Amy Coney Barrett and Thomas Hardiman.

The White House has been preparing information on all four, who were part of a longer list of 25 names vetted by conservative groups.

Thomas Hardiman

Trump has expressed renewed interest in 52-year-old Thomas Hardiman – the runner-up when Trump nominated Gorsuch, the Associated Press news agency reported, citing two people with knowledge of his thinking who were not authorised to speak publicly. The situation appeared to remain fluid.

Hardiman has a personal connection to the president, having served with Trump’s sister on the 3rd US Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia.

He went to the University of Notre Dame as the first person in his family to go to college. He financed his law degree at the Georgetown University Law Center by driving a taxi.

Brett Kavanaugh

Some conservatives have expressed concerns about 53-year-old Brett Kavanaugh – a longtime judge and former clerk for Kennedy – questioning his commitment to social issues like abortion and noting his time serving under President George W Bush as evidence he is a more establishment choice. But his supporters cite his experience and wide range of legal opinions.

He recently voiced disagreement with a court decision allowing an undocumented teenage immigrant to get an abortion.

He is also a former law clerk to Kennedy, as is Kethledge.

Amy Coney Barrett

Amy Coney Barrett is a longtime Notre Dame Law School professor who became a federal judge last fall.

The 46-year-old’s name has excited some social conservatives because she was questioned about her Roman Catholic faith in her nomination hearings last year. Her brief time on the bench, however, has raised questions about her experience.

Raymond Kethledge

Raymond Kethledge serves as a judge on the US Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit in Cincinnati, Ohio.

The 51-year-old co-authored a book with Army veteran Mike Erwin of The Positivity Project published last year called “Lead Yourself First: Inspiring Leadership Through Solitude.”

None of the judges named is older than 53, meaning any of them could sit on the court for several decades, allowing Trump to make a lasting imprint on the nation’s laws.

What’s at stake?

Though appointed by a Republican, outgoing Justice Kennedy was often a swing vote on the nine-member court.

Trump’s choice will dramatically affect many aspects of American life, from abortion to voting rights to the environment.

While Kennedy was conservative on firearms and election financing, he could be more progressive on issues such as abortion and affirmative action.

An example of this came in 2015, when, thanks to him, same-sex marriage was legalisedacross the United States.

As a result, Democrats – unable to block the nominee unless they lure some Republican senators to their side – have stressed the high stakes of the president’s decision as they prepare for the confirmation battle ahead.

They fear Trump’s pick could shift the ideological balance of the court and thereby place women’s reproductive rights, healthcare and LGBT rights at risk.

It’s never a guarantee that a judge will vote any particular way, however. Retired Justice David Souter was considered a “home run” for conservatives when he was nominated by President George HW Bush but became a generally liberal vote for most of his 18 years on the court.

Roe v Wade

Of particular concern for abortion rights advocates is the landmark 1973 Roe v Wade decision, which protects a woman’s right to abortion.

Top Senate Democrat Chuck Schumer called Trump recently to warn it would be “cataclysmic” for national unity if he nominated someone hostile to Roe v Wade, according to a person familiar with the discussion, the Associated Press reported.

During the 2016 campaign, Trump said he would put “pro-life justices on the court”, thrilling his grassroots base although polls show most Americans support abortion rights.

Pro-abortion and anti-abortion rights activists gather at the Supreme Court for the National March for Life rally in Washington, DC [Aaron P Bernstein/Reuters]

Abortion opponents were disappointed in 1992 when three Republican appointees – Kennedy, Souter and Sandra Day O’Connor – agreed to reaffirm the 1973 decision.

But with Souter and O’Connor no longer on the court and Kennedy on his way out, abortion rights are clearly on the minds of many voters.

What are Republicans and Democrats saying?

Democratic legislators, who have a minority of seats in both houses of Congress, have acknowledged there is no clear path to block Trump’s pick for the lifetime appointment to the Supreme Court.

While the US Senate once required a 60-vote supermajority to overcome blocking tactics against Supreme Court nominees, the Republican majority changed the rules last year during the debate on Justice Neil Gorsuch.

Senate rules now require only a simple majority of votes to confirm a Supreme Court nomination.

Republicans currently control 51 of the 100 Senate seats, although one of their number, Senator John McCain, is at home in Arizona battling cancer.

Democrats have asked McConnell to delay a vote until after November, noting that Republicans blocked President Barack Obama’s nominee Merrick Garland before the 2016 election. But Republicans have scoffed at that suggestion, pointing out Obama nominated Justice Elena Kagan in advance of the 2010 midterm elections.

For Democrats, the focus is on two Republicans: Senator Susan Collins of Maine and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska. Both support a woman’s right to have an abortion and will be looking for assurances that the nominee would not overturn the Roe v Wade decision.

On the Democratic side, the focus will be on Senators Heidi Heitkamp of North Dakota, Joe Donnelly of Indiana and Joe Manchin of West Virginia.

All three voted to confirm Gorsuch and are up for re-election in states that Trump won. Whatever they decide will upset a large group of voters in their home states.

If Collins and Murkowski vote “no” and Democrats all vote “no”, the nomination would be blocked. If McCain were to miss the vote, only one GOP defection would be needed to block the nomination if all Democrats were opposed.

While this is unlikely, the Democrats are using it to make the case that their supporters have to get out and vote so Democrats can regain control of Congress, and eventually the White House.

The US Supreme Court is made up of nine justices [File: J Scott Applewhite/AP Photo]

Advocacy groups also play an important role in the process.

Groups that support abortion rights are planning a “Day of Action” for August 26, the anniversary of the 1920 adoption of the 19th Amendment giving women the right to vote.

The liberal advocacy group Demand Justice will spend $5m on ads through September.

Meanwhile, the conservative Judicial Crisis Network is targeting vulnerable Democratic incumbents in its ad campaigns. The deep-pocketed group advertised against Senate confirmation of Garland and spent millions more advocating for Gorsuch.

What happens after Trump makes the announcement?

Following Trump’s announcement, a series of meetings between individual senators and the nominee will take place before confirmation hearings begin.

Much of the groundwork for a successful confirmation takes place in these private meetings. For legislators who are not on the Judiciary Committee, it may be their only chance to talk to the nominee personally before a final vote.

Neil Gorsuch met nearly three-quarters of the Senate in advance of his hearings.

The Senate’s Republican leadership has said it aims to complete the confirmation process before November’s midterm elections.

It’s hard to say when the confirmation hearings will take place, though many speculate they will be scheduled for the end of August since the Senate will be in session that month.

The hearings take place with the Senate Judiciary Committee, which has 11 Republicans and 10 Democrats.

Hearings for the most recent nominees to the Supreme Court have lasted four or five days, though there were 11 days of hearings for Robert Bork’s nomination in 1987.

The Judiciary Committee does not need to approve the nomination for it to advance. A negative recommendation or no recommendation merely alerts the Senate that a substantial number of committee members have reservations.

The final vote by the Senate usually takes place a week or two weeks after the hearings.

The process may take longer if Trump nominates an individual that is seen to be controversial, even among Republicans.

Why does the Supreme Court nomination matter?

The Supreme Court is the ultimate check on the president and Congress.

The appointment is for life, or until the person retires, to insulate the court from politics. That means anyone appointed to the court can influence decisions long after the president who appointed them leaves office.

Conservatives already have a 5-4 majority on the court. But that majority hasn’t always been reliable, in part because of Kennedy, who became the court’s most frequent tie-breaker and swing vote.

Who are the other Supreme Court justices?

The Supreme Court consists of nine justices. There are currently five, including outgoing Kennedy, who were nominated by Republican presidents and four nominated by Democratic presidents.

Nominated by a Republican:

Chief Justice John Roberts was nominated by George W Bush in 2005. The 63-year-old was initially nominated as an associate justice to replace retiring Justice Sandra Day O’Connor, but when William Rehnquist died before Roberts’ confirmation hearings began, Bush nominated him as chief justice.

Samuel Alito was nominated by George W Bush in 2005 to replace retiring Justice Sandra Day O’Connor. The 68-year-old was confirmed in late January 2006 after a failed attempt at a filibuster.

Clarence Thomas was nominated by George HW Bush 1991 to replace retiring Justice Thurgood Marshall. The 70-year-old was confirmed in October of that year.

Neil Gorsuch was nominated by Donald Trump in 2017. The 50-year-old succeeded Justice Antonin Scalia who died in February 2016. Scalia’s death prompted a showdown between then-President Barack Obama and the Republican-controlled chamber that confirms Supreme Court nominees. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell refused to hold a hearing for Obama’s nominee, Chief Judge Merrick Garland, for nearly a year – an action that continues to galvanise Democrats.

Anthony Kennedy was nominated by Ronald Reagan and 1987 and sworn in the following year. The 81-year-old announced his retirement at the end of last month, saying it was the “highest of honours” to serve on the court. His retirement takes effect on July 31.

Nominated by a Democrat:

Ruth Bader Ginsburg was nominated by Bill Clinton in 1993 to replace retiring Justice Byron White. The 85-year-old was confirmed the same year. She is the second female justice to serve on the court.

Stephen Breyer was nominated by Bill Clinton in 1994 to replace retiring Justice Harry Blackmun. The 79-year-old was confirmed the same year.

Sonia Sotomayor was nominated by Barack Obama in 2009 and confirmed the same year. She is the third female justice to serve on the court and the first justice of Hispanic descent. The 64-year-old replaced Justice David Souter.

Elena Kagan was nominated by Barack Obama in 2010 and confirmed the same year. She replaced retiring Justice John Paul Stevens. The 58-year-old is the fourth female justice to serve on the court. She is also the first justice to be appointed without any prior judicial experience since William Rehnquist’s appointment in 1972.


  1. 742382 111960Can I just now say that of a relief to locate somebody who truly knows what theyre speaking about online. You really know how to bring a difficulty to light and work out it crucial. The diet need to see this and appreciate this side on the story. I cant believe youre no a lot more popular since you surely possess the gift. 352249

  2. 461255 646105It is perfect time to make some plans for the future and its time to be happy. Ive read this post and if I could I wish to suggest you some intriguing things or suggestions. Maybe you can write next articles referring to this write-up. I want to read even much more things about it! 850989

  3. 523851 924945Oh my goodness! an incredible post dude. Thank you Nonetheless Im experiencing challenge with ur rss . Don know why Unable to subscribe to it. Is there anyone acquiring related rss drawback? Anybody who knows kindly respond. Thnkx 942482

  4. I am not sure where you’re getting your information, but great topic. I needs to spend some time learning much more or understanding more. Thanks for magnificent information I was looking for this info for my mission.

  5. Good site! I truly love how it is simple on my eyes and the data are well written. I am wondering how I could be notified whenever a new post has been made. I’ve subscribed to your feed which must do the trick! Have a great day!

  6. We’re a group of volunteers and starting a new scheme in our community. Your website provided us with valuable info to work on. You have done a formidable job and our entire community will be thankful to you.

  7. You actually make it seem so easy with your presentation but I find this matter to be really something which I think I would never understand. It seems too complicated and very broad for me. I’m looking forward for your next post, I’ll try to get the hang of it!

  8. Each and every time I visit this web site there’s a new challenge and improved for me to learn from. Haha I’ve experienced your source code several times to understand how you’re doing some things to wear them my site. Thanks! I’m able to coach you on about approaches to easy.

  9. Thank you for sharing superb informations. Your web site is so cool. I’m impressed by the details that you¡¦ve on this website. It reveals how nicely you understand this subject. Bookmarked this web page, will come back for extra articles. You, my friend, ROCK! I found simply the information I already searched all over the place and just couldn’t come across. What a great web site.

  10. Hey There. I found your blog using msn. This is an extremely well written article. I’ll be sure to bookmark it and come back to read more of your useful information. Thanks for the post. I’ll certainly comeback.

  11. Excellent goods from you, man. I have understand your stuff previous to and you’re just too wonderful. I really like what you have acquired here, really like what you’re stating and the way in which you say it. You make it entertaining and you still care for to keep it smart. I can’t wait to read much more from you. This is actually a terrific web site.

  12. This is really interesting, You’re a very skilled blogger. I have joined your rss feed and look forward to seeking more of your great post. Also, I have shared your web site in my social networks!


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here